Sunday, November 18, 2012

Review: Lincoln (2012)

Daniel Day-Lewis goes for a third Oscar.

Directed by Steven Spielberg
Produced by Kathleen Kennedy and Steven Spielberg
Written by Tony Kushner (screenplay); Doris Kearns Goodwin (book)
Starring Daniel Day-Lewis, Sally Field, David Strathairn, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, James Spader, Hal Holbrook, and Tommy Lee Jones

***1/2 (Original rating: ***)

Lincoln is yet another Oscar grab attempt with yet another biopic. Films like this will always be made, but many of them are forgettable. This is somewhere in between. With the Civil War dwindling, President Abraham Lincoln (Day-Lewis) attempts to push the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution through Congress, thus ending slavery. He receives the help of Thaddeus Stevens (Jones) and other political allies as he tries to bring the nation together in a step towards racial equality and, of course, the end of the war. To do this, he must get enough Democrats to vote for the amendment, which takes some dealings behind the scenes to accomplish. With his wife Mary (Field) by his side, he talks and talks and talks, inspiring those who surround him until the job is done. But Lincoln remains a mystery, even after the last shot fades to black. 

Spielberg's latest film is one of words and deeds, with some flashy cinematography and solid performances thrown in for good measure. There are speeches galore, and Lincoln always has a rousing anecdote or a ready metaphor for his weary fellows. As you've no doubt heard, Daniel Day-Lewis gives a great performance, as the virtuous, kind, heavily burdened father of the American nation during the Civil War. Jones and Field are appropriately praised, but the large supporting cast, consisting of numerous character actors, deliver fine work with minimal screen time. Given the period aspect of the film, the production design and costumes are eye-catching, and John Williams' score is his typical sentimental undercurrent. (More War Horse than Schindler's List.) The film keeps the words flowing until a sudden and rather anticlimactic ending. While it is far from bad, it stays more along the lines of decent to mediocre. Admirable performances and good production values abound, but the film never feels as important as its subject matter. 

Oscar Potential: Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor, Best Supporting Actor (Jones), Best Supporting Actress (Field), Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Production Design, Best Cinematography, Best Costume Design, Best Film Editing, Best Original Score, Best Makeup and Hairstyling, Best Sound Mixing

10 comments:

  1. Good review Josh. Not a perfect movie by any means, but one that kept me interested and entertained the whole-way through. I can definitely see a lot of nominations for this come next-year and I will have no problem with that idea either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Dan. I don't think it deserves all of those nominations, but I enjoyed it overall.

      Delete
  2. I know it's terrible of me to say but one Lincoln movie in a year is enough for me. I actually thought the Vampire Hunter one was fun, but I didn't see it seeking history lesson, ahah. This one does have Oscar bait written all over it and it kind of puts me off.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I didn't see Vampire Hunter, but I know what you mean. It annoys me when biopics like these are announced, because all I can think of is the Oscars the filmmakers are trying to get. Oh well.

      Delete
  3. I'll see this, although I'm not that interested in it. Are you one who now thinks that DDL is winning the Oscar? Most who have seen it that I know jumped immediately on that bandwagon. I'm not sold, but then again, I haven't seen it yet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope. I don't think DDL should or will win. But I do think the film gets at least 10 nominations easily.

      Delete
  4. Yeah, it looks like textbook mediocre movie. Typical history stuff with sentimental score and great performances, that is unfortunetly boring. I may watch it on DVD, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's pretty much what it is. I wouldn't even nominate DDL for Best Actor.

      Delete
  5. I keep reading lukewarm reviews of this movie. I still want to see it -- I'd watch it for the historical content and the cast, if nothing else.

    From what I've gleaned, Lincoln was an exceptionally complex human being and -- as a leader -- more morally ambiguous than the history books would have us believe. I'd love to see a film do justice to that, as well as to the incredible complexity of the issues surrounding the Civil War and emancipation.

    I'm guessing this film isn't the one?? :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, it does a pretty good job on that front. There are definitely some questionable tactics used by Lincoln in the film.

      Delete